View Single Post
  #29  
Old 02-03-2012, 05:14 AM
DaveInDenver's Avatar
DaveInDenver DaveInDenver is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Larimer County
Posts: 7,005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nakman View Post
does 70cm propogate better in the mountains (and canyons) than 2m
No, it does not and that's the point. It is more easily absorbed by terrain and does not multipath as badly as VHF, is less likely to duct in the troposphere, so less interference and less chance for random DX. The low side of UHF is more VHF-like than VHF.

Like I mentioned, I usually ragchew on the RMRL's 449.450/-5MHz/103.5 and I suggest using 446.000MHz simplex if you want to check paths since there might be people listening on that.
__________________
'91 Pickup - Imelda
'08 Tacoma TRD - Donna
'09 Kawasaki KLR650
'12 Gunnar Rockhound 29

"Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. Nobody is able to achieve this completely, but the striving for such achievement is in itself a part of the liberation and a foundation for inner security. " --Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote