Rising Sun Member Forums  

Go Back   Rising Sun Member Forums > Toyota 4x4 > Land Use

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-12-2006, 08:24 AM
Crash's Avatar
Crash Crash is offline
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,895
Default Forwarded by James Bingham:

Steve,
Could you forward this to the RS land use director?
I'm still on the e-mail list for United Four Wheel Drive Assn.and this was in my e=mail box today.


Change the state name to Colorado, and edit out the personel parts of this letter and it makes a great letter for all foreset users!! Start with paragraph 4.
The entire lettter is wonderful!

Thanks
bcdo typing w/o many cups of java this am *<);^0


-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: woodmansee <woodmansee@ll.net>
>Sent: Jul 12, 2006 7:07 AM
>To: uniteddelegates@six.pairlist.net
>Subject: [UnitedDelegates] need response
>
>Hi All,
>One of our members, Dave Westerberg, got a very good letter published
>in our second largest population center here in MN (the letter is
>below). His letter was of course celebrated among our association.
>Only one rebuttal letter from the anti's has been published but that
>one rebuttal said that Westerberg did not speak for all off-roaders. I
>wish to write back to this anti's comments (most of which centered
>around the global warming and national security issues of recreating in
>a manner that uses petrol
>products) and I want to be able to say that Westerberg's comments DO
>represent all responsible off-roaders. So, if I could just get a
>response from you all saying that his letter hits the nail in the head
>for the group you are representing I would feel that is enough for me
>to write in my letter that Westerberg's comments represent off-roaders
>nation wide. Seems silly maybe, but I just want to cover my behind.
>Thanks, Alex.
>
>
>
>
>Commentary by DAVID WESTERBERG
>Off-road enthusiasts deserve access to state forests Why can't I use
>the forest, too?
>
>For those who didn't follow the state Legislature this winter, I have
>some news. There were amendments to the fish and wildlife bills in the
>House and the Senate that would have denied access to recreational
>opportunities in state forests. Thankfully, the measures died in
>committee. However, because they were passed on the floor, I believe
>the possibility remains the amendments could be reintroduced in coming
>years.
>
>I'm an environmentalist. I care about what happens in our forests as
>much as the next guy. In fact, I care more than most. I grew up the son
>of a Department of Natural Resources forester. I was probably the only
>kid in kindergarten who could tell you how much wood was in a cord, the
>difference between a red pine and a white pine, and how to determine
>the age of a tree without cutting it down.
>
>I've probably planted more trees than most members of the Sierra Club.
>I've probably cleared and maintained more miles of trails than any
>member of the Minnesotans for Responsible Recreation. I've hauled tons
>of garbage out of the woods, only to be told I wasn't welcome in the
>woods with my Jeep.
>
>I understand there are areas in state forests with rare plants, and I
>don't want to go there. I know there are wetlands that could be damaged
>if I were to drive my Jeep into them. I don't want to go there, either.
>I know in some areas my tires may cause erosion. I won't go there.
>
>But I'd like to be able to take my wife and son on a drive along a
>trail and have a picnic lunch. Why can't I do that? There are areas in
>our forests where trails exist that can sustain travel by a 4x4 like
>mine. Why can't I use those areas?
>
>I understand there are people out there who enjoy the peace and quiet
>of the forest; I do, too. But I also enjoy driving my Jeep along a
>tight trail under the canopy of trees. And I understand that my Jeep
>can disturb the peace and quiet of other people. So if we, as off- road
>enthusiasts, were given areas within forests designated for our use,
>people seeking peace and quiet could avoid us and we could all enjoy
>the recreational opportunities our state forests provide.
>
>No one group should have more rights to the forests than others. The
>forests are public lands, and if we can find areas where we have a
>minimal impact, why can't we use those areas?
>
>To just throw a blanket ban over the forests is not the answer.
>
>I know there's people in the off-roading community with little regard
>for the environment. They have fun tearing up the countryside, and some
>even take pride in the damage they do. We in the off-road community are
>working hard to educate these people that what they are doing is
>harmful and that their behavior will not be tolerated. The Minnesota 4
>Wheel Drive Association spends thousands of dollars each year on
>education and law enforcement to prevent these incidents. I'm just as
>upset about them as members of the Minnesotans for Responsible
>Recreation. It sickens me to see an area where people have taken
>off-road vehicles and caused damage to the environment. I think they
>should be punished.
>
>But is it fair to take trails away from me, a law-abiding person? No.
>Are hiking trails taken away when hikers venture off and create new
>trails and cause erosion? No.
>
>I've worked in state parks and for the Minnesota Conservation Corps,
>and I've seen damage caused by hikers, bikers, fisherman and horseback
>riders when they don't stick to the existing trail systems.
>
>Taking trails away only leads to more illegal activity.
>
>People need places to recreate. Yes, there is an off-highway vehicle
>park in Gilbert. But that's only a small area for a lot of people who
>enjoy off-roading. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources policy
>states it will provide outdoor recreation opportunities for all
>Minnesotans.
>
>Well, I am a resident of Minnesota and I want to keep my recreational
>opportunities. I want to keep my access to the state forests.
>
>And it isn't just my Jeep some want to ban. It's all 4x4 vehicles.
>Hunters, trappers, fisherman and berry pickers: If you want to keep
>your access to the forests, too, let your voices be heard -- before
>your recreational opportunities are taken away. Contact your
>representatives and let them know you want to have responsible access
>to public lands.
>
>_______________________________________________
>UnitedDelegates mailing list
>UnitedDelegates@six.pairlist.net
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/list...niteddelegates
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2006, 08:34 AM
Red_Chili's Avatar
Red_Chili Red_Chili is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Littleton CO
Posts: 8,409
Default

Great letter...
__________________
-Bill Morgan
Heb Dduw, heb ddim; Duw a digon
Abnormally aspirated
KDěRCH
Bio Page
I'm that gun-totin', farm-raised, evangelical, pro-environment, OHV ridin'/drivin', Southern civil rights pro-labor Liberal yo' momma told you couldn't possibly exist.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.