Rising Sun Member Forums  

Go Back   Rising Sun Member Forums > Toyota 4x4 > General Tech Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-29-2006, 02:28 PM
Romer's Avatar
Romer Romer is online now
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 7,171
Default Governor

I don;t care much for either choice for Governer. Are either one of them better or worse for off road stuff?
__________________
Ken Romer - K0ROM
04 UZJ100
77 FJ40
11 RX350
02 Kimberley Kamper

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-29-2006, 05:27 PM
treerootCO's Avatar
treerootCO treerootCO is offline
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,574
Send a message via AIM to treerootCO
Default

I only see my governor around 110
__________________
aka Mike D.----->Bio Page KDøGWY
“He who goes unarmed in paradise had better be sure that that is where he is.”—James Thurber
"Its better to be thought a fool rather than to speak up and remove all doubt." - Lincoln
pride is ego, the word I had lost was dignity. The quality or state of being worthy of esteem or respect.
Ptarmigan build thread - 95FZJ80
www.root45.com
www.risingsun4x4club.org

TLCA #14133

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2006, 08:26 AM
MDH33's Avatar
MDH33 MDH33 is offline
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Land of Corn
Posts: 5,803
Default

I would not vote for Beauprez. He's all about more development and leasing all of our public lands to oil and gas companies. To me, that means more land that will be off limits.
__________________
--Martin

'85 FJ60
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-30-2006, 09:27 AM
sno bored's Avatar
sno bored sno bored is offline
Locked
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Breckenridge,CO
Posts: 237
Default

Romer, I think you did a pretty good job a few years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-30-2006, 09:33 AM
Romer's Avatar
Romer Romer is online now
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 7,171
Default

I have often wondered if I did run for office if I would get votes just because of my last name. I don't want to be in Politics though.
__________________
Ken Romer - K0ROM
04 UZJ100
77 FJ40
11 RX350
02 Kimberley Kamper

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-30-2006, 09:54 AM
wesintl's Avatar
wesintl wesintl is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: in da house
Posts: 7,607
Send a message via AIM to wesintl
Default

I haven't decided either...

I'm not under the assumption that leasing public lands to gas and oil companies means it's off limits. If drilling means less need for foreign product, then i'm all for it.

Ritter
http://www.ritterforgovernor.com/issuesSP.cfm

As part of my vision for Colorado in the 21st century, I will be a strong participant in the process that follows the work of the Roadless Area Review Task Force. The task force will recommend which of the more than 4 million federal roadless forest lands in Colorado should remain protected, and I will advocate for a balanced, common-sense approach to land management.

Beauprez
http://bobbeauprez.com/issues/bob_be...on_hunting.asp
It's also critically important that Colorado's next Governor is willing to fight for public access to our public lands. We're blessed to have so m
__________________
See you on the trail
WØREK
Couple o' FJ40's, BJ70, UZJ100, TDI 66FJ40,82FJ60,97FZJ80
TLCA#4180
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-30-2006, 10:24 AM
Red_Chili's Avatar
Red_Chili Red_Chili is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Littleton CO
Posts: 8,409
Default

I do see oil and gas as sometimes being mutually exclusive to off roading. Witness, for instance, Iron Chest. We are really lucky they returned it to its former condition, but many of our roads go to mines and other exploration and can be closed at a whim, like Gillespie for instance.

It's pretty depressing. On one hand, you have a party that is beholden to special interests (not our special interest!) and will shut down public access if they see a reason to, in order to further their idealistic values and if their supporters want it.







Then you have the Democrat party...,
ditto.
__________________
-Bill Morgan
Heb Dduw, heb ddim; Duw a digon
Abnormally aspirated
KDØRCH
Bio Page
I'm that gun-totin', farm-raised, evangelical, pro-environment, OHV ridin'/drivin', Southern civil rights pro-labor Liberal yo' momma told you couldn't possibly exist.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-30-2006, 10:28 AM
Uncle Ben's Avatar
Uncle Ben Uncle Ben is offline
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Louisville, Colorado
Posts: 13,168
Send a message via AIM to Uncle Ben
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by treerootCO
I only see my governor around 110

Time to rechip that dog!
__________________
KØUBN
Kevin
TLCA #3007
Northside!

Colorado Trail Patrol
Stay on the Trail!
I'm the God-fearing, gun-toting, American flag-waving, conservative you were warned about!
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxleIke View Post
I need an FJ40....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Chili View Post
Cruisers are superior
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-30-2006, 03:08 PM
Seldom Seen's Avatar
Seldom Seen Seldom Seen is offline
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Highlands Ranch
Posts: 542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wesintl
I haven't decided either...

I'm not under the assumption that leasing public lands to gas and oil companies means it's off limits. If drilling means less need for foreign product, then i'm all for it.

I would agree with you IF it was worth the cost. But the geologists for the state DNR have estimated, at the current rate of consumption, *IF* all the oil under Colorado could be extracted and refined into gasoline, it would amount to a 1 week supply.

None of the extraction business operating in this state are Colorado owned and most are foreign owned. The extraction industry pays billions of $$ a year, in royalties, to the state and (mostly) federal government. Royalties paid by the extraction companies is put into the state and federal general funds. By the time it trickles down into local land managers budgets it doesn't cover the cost of the improvements (read roads) that land managers build to allow the extraction industry access to the mineral resources. There is no guarantee that any roads created will remain open for recreation. There is millions$$ of backlog of maintenance on roads that are open for recreational use. What little money land managers have would be put to better use maintaining and reconnecting Colorado's recreational roads and trails.

In 1988 recreational tourism surpassed extraction as CO's #1 industry, and has seen steady sustainable growth ever since. The $$$'s contributed directly to CO's economy and The full time year round jobs created by, the recreational use of Arapaho/Roosevelt National forest alone is more than the extraction industries contribution from the entire state. Add in the recreation/tourism $$ from CO's other National Forests and you can see CO's greatest natural resource is above ground and not beneath it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-31-2006, 10:23 AM
Red_Chili's Avatar
Red_Chili Red_Chili is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Littleton CO
Posts: 8,409
Default

As long as we can actually access it.

Which depends of course on our ability to articulate its worth, as Brian has admirably done.
__________________
-Bill Morgan
Heb Dduw, heb ddim; Duw a digon
Abnormally aspirated
KDØRCH
Bio Page
I'm that gun-totin', farm-raised, evangelical, pro-environment, OHV ridin'/drivin', Southern civil rights pro-labor Liberal yo' momma told you couldn't possibly exist.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.