Rising Sun Member Forums  

Go Back   Rising Sun Member Forums > Toyota 4x4 > Land Use

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-11-2008, 10:31 AM
Red_Chili's Avatar
Red_Chili Red_Chili is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Littleton CO
Posts: 8,409
Default Deadline Today, 4/11 - San Juan travel management

It is important to get your comments in!
---------------------------------------------

BRC ALL MODALITY ALERT -- SNOWMOBILE - MOUNTAIN BIKE - OHV
LAST CHANCE TO COMMENT ON SAN JUAN PUBLIC LANDS DRAFT PLAN, COMMENT DEADLINE TOMORROW (FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 2008)

Dear BRC Action Alert Subscriber,
The San Juan National Forest and San Juan District Office of the Bureau of Land Management has released a combined Draft Land Management Plan for public review and comment. The Draft Plan and other information is available for review on the web at: http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/forestPlan.
A majority of this area is already set aside for the exclusive use of non-motorized recreationists. It contains vast areas already closed to motorized uses and a lot of area is already off limits to mountain bikes. These areas contain a lot of world-class exclusive hiking and cross-country skiing opportunities. It also includes the Lizard Head Wilderness area, the South San Juan Wilderness area and the Weminuche Wilderness area -- totaling nearly one half million acres.
Incredibly, the Forest Service and BLM want to further limit motorized and mountain bike uses!
The comment deadline is tomorrow April 11, 2008. This is your last chance to comment on the Draft Plan. Please take just a minute to send comments. We've made it insanely easy for you via a simple three step action item below.
As always, if you have any questions or need any help, please call.
Brian Hawthorne 208-237-1008 ext 102
Ric Foster 208-237-1008 ext 107
BlueRibbon Coalition Public Lands Department
PS: BRC wants to send a note of gratitude to our Colorado partners. In particular, the Colorado Snowmobile Association (CSA)(http://www.coloradosledcity.com/), the San Juan Trail Riders (SJTR) (http://www.sanjuantrailriders.org/) and the Western Slope 4-Wheelers (WS4W) (http://www.ws4w.com/). All of these groups have been very involved in the process and have earned your membership.
Action Item: Submit Comments
Step 1:
Click on the following link http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/forestPlan/comments_07/comments.asp, read over the introduction and click "Next."
Step 2:
Fill out the contact information and click the "Submit & Continue" button at the bottom of the form.
Step 3:
Read over the instructions, then copy and paste your comments into the box at the bottom of the page and then click the "Submit & Continue" button (see Suggested Comments below).
SUGGESTED COMMENTS:
I object to the way the proposal tilts the management "balance" toward the more extreme preservationist philosophy. Most of the planning area is already set aside for non-motorized recreation. There is no need for further restrictions on motorized and mountain bike uses. Clearly, Alternative A does the best job of balancing the need to provide for recreational uses and to protect the environment.
Despite many comments asking for an alternative that, at the minimum, sustain the current motorized and mountain bike uses, all of the Alternatives developed by the agencies include drastic reductions. The agencies need to develop a true range of alternatives. This is a very serious problem in this planning process. I request that the agencies include at least one alternative that does not limit motorized and mountain bike use.
There is no rational connection between the facts on the ground and the proposed action. In other words, there is no valid reason to restrict motorized and mountain bike recreation as proposed by the agencies.
Your plan says that segregation of users is being asked for by the non-motorized community. But non-motorized users are not fully utilizing all of the existing areas that are now set aside for their exclusive use. Thus, comments received by the agencies may well be a "tactic" to achieve the objectives of several Wilderness advocacy groups, rather than a true indication of recreational conflict.
The agencies' own analysis indicates that motorized recreation is growing in popularity. Motorized use is a legitimate use of public lands and is now required to be managed by being limited to designated roads, trails and areas. Yet the agencies are proposing significant closures. The agencies have responded to the increase in motorized uses by proposing drastic reductions in that use. This is not logical.
'Separating uses' is a poor 'last resort' option since it is extremely polarizing and nearly always leads to long-term ill-will and decreased support for the agency in general. The San Juan Public Lands Center should be extremely cautious about enthusiastically embracing segregation - it wasn't good for this country in regards to race and certainly is not good public policy for land management
__________________
-Bill Morgan
Heb Dduw, heb ddim; Duw a digon
Abnormally aspirated
KDěRCH
Bio Page
I'm that gun-totin', farm-raised, evangelical, pro-environment, OHV ridin'/drivin', Southern civil rights pro-labor Liberal yo' momma told you couldn't possibly exist.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2008, 10:38 AM
Red_Chili's Avatar
Red_Chili Red_Chili is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Littleton CO
Posts: 8,409
Default

I modified the comments to fit my wording, and left out some of the more incendiary language. I emphasized that closures result in increased environmental impact on remaining open areas, and that segregation of use is unreasonable where nonmotorized users are not fully utilizing the areas they already have - while OHV use is becoming more popular, yet more highly restricted to smaller areas.
__________________
-Bill Morgan
Heb Dduw, heb ddim; Duw a digon
Abnormally aspirated
KDěRCH
Bio Page
I'm that gun-totin', farm-raised, evangelical, pro-environment, OHV ridin'/drivin', Southern civil rights pro-labor Liberal yo' momma told you couldn't possibly exist.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:27 AM
Tch2fly's Avatar
Tch2fly Tch2fly is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peachtree City, Georgia
Posts: 929
Default

Done
__________________
Mike W.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:36 AM
Corbet's Avatar
Corbet Corbet is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 3,898
Default

done
__________________
Speski OffRoad LTD, Cargo Solutions for Toyota 4x4's http://www.SpeskiOffRoad.com
"80 series, with a fridge"
1976 FJ40, Project with little progress.
2004 Starcraft 10RT

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:58 AM
Jacket's Avatar
Jacket Jacket is offline
Rising Sun Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lafayette
Posts: 3,996
Default

I'm in
__________________
- Matt
1976 FJ40 - green and mostly stock
1996 FZJ80 - not so stock
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2008, 02:33 PM
rock_wagon's Avatar
rock_wagon rock_wagon is offline
Lifted
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ft Collins
Posts: 103
Default

Done - THANKS
__________________
Will
1996 LX450
W0WIL
http://www.coloradobluemountain.com - Drink Local Wine!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-11-2008, 02:52 PM
Bikeman Bikeman is offline
Hard Core 4+
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Highlands Ranch
Posts: 685
Default

Done.
__________________
Mike


1997 FZJ80, White, Locked, deflared, 5.29'd, 4-5" lift, Fox's, DC shafts F/R, 35" AT's, Metal Tech front bumper w/ winch, custom tube rear bumper, SROR sliders, IPOR skid, Custom exhaust, Snorkel, Eezi-Awn 1600, Mark's Speedo Box.

2008 Subaru WRX Wagon, mods and lifted on 27's

2001 Honda XR400 with goodies
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.